The Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana (PMGKAY) has been a crucial intervention in addressing food security concerns, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. Recently, the Indian government announced its extension for an additional five years, signaling a continued focus on ensuring access to essential foodgrains for vulnerable populations. This decision integrates short-term relief measures with the larger framework of the National Food Security Act (NFSA), 2013, providing a safety net for millions. However, while the move has immediate benefits, it also presents challenges related to fiscal sustainability and long-term policy effectiveness.
What is PMGKAY?
Origin and Purpose: Launched in 2020 during the Covid-19 pandemic to provide 5 kg of free foodgrains per person to eligible households under the NFSA.
Key Extensions: Initially set to end in December 2022, extended till December 2023, and now for another five years.
Scale and Impact: Over 1,118 lakh metric tonnes of foodgrains allocated since inception, with a financial outlay of ₹3.9 lakh crore.
About the National Food Security Act, 2013
Rights-Based Approach: Marks a shift from welfare to rights-based food security, legally covering up to 67% of the population.
Beneficiaries: Includes Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) and Priority Households (PHH).
Key Provisions:
AAY families: 35 kg of foodgrains per month.
PHH families: 5 kg per person per month.
Eldest woman as the head of the household for issuing ration cards.
Integration of PMGKAY with NFSA
In January 2023, the PMGKAY was merged with the NFSA, providing rations at no cost to AAY and PHH families.
This move eliminated pandemic-specific provisions while continuing the free ration component as a universal benefit.
Impacts of the Extension of PMGKAY
Positive Impacts:
Food Security Assurance: Ensures uninterrupted access to food for vulnerable populations, addressing immediate nutritional needs.
Crisis Resilience: Acts as a safety net during natural disasters or economic disruptions.
Support to Farmers: Boosts rural economies through large-scale procurement of foodgrains.
Social Welfare: Promotes equity and community well-being, reinforcing collective responsibility.
Negative Impacts:
Fiscal Strain: The program’s long-term cost, including rising procurement expenses, could burden the government budget and widen the fiscal deficit.
Market Disruptions: Heavy subsidies can distort market prices, affecting private traders and the agricultural sector.
Dependency Culture: Risks fostering reliance on government aid, hindering self-sufficiency.
Policy Populism: May encourage unsustainable competitive populist measures, putting additional pressure on public finances.
Way Forward
Short-Term Measures:
Digital Food Vouchers: Introduce e-Rupi vouchers for targeted food purchases to ensure efficient and transparent distribution.
Crowdsourced Distribution Systems: Leverage technology platforms for redistributing surplus food to the needy, fostering community participation.
Long-Term Strategies:
Economic Empowerment Programs: Focus on skill development, employment generation, and entrepreneurship to enhance self-reliance.
Gradual Subsidy Reduction: Phase out subsidies incrementally while implementing alternative support mechanisms to prevent economic shocks.
Strengthening Agricultural Infrastructure: Improve procurement, storage, and supply chain management to reduce wastage and ensure efficient distribution.
Conclusion
The extension of the PMGKAY demonstrates the government’s commitment to addressing food security challenges and ensuring welfare for marginalized sections. However, achieving a balance between short-term relief and long-term sustainability is essential. By coupling the program with economic empowerment initiatives and prudent fiscal policies, the government can ensure that food security measures align with broader developmental goals.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
