Local governance in India, institutionalized through the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments, forms the third tier of governance.
Panchayats and Municipalities are critical for grassroots development, public service delivery, and infrastructure planning.
Despite their importance, challenges like inadequate finances, weak autonomy, and urbanization stress hinder their effectiveness.
Current Structure of Local Governance in India
About:
Local bodies are self-governance institutions responsible for planning, development, and administration in rural (Panchayats) and urban (Municipalities) areas.
They act as regulators, service providers, welfare agents, and facilitators of grassroots development.
Constitutional Framework:
Local government is a State subject under the Seventh Schedule (List II) of the Constitution.
Article 243G provides for the devolution of powers, enabling local bodies to deliver infrastructure and services.
Evolution of Local Bodies:
British Era: Panchayati Raj envisioned as "Gram Swaraj" by Mahatma Gandhi.
1952: Community Development Programme lacked public participation.
1957: Balwantrai Mehta Committee advocated village-level organizations for implementing schemes.
Only 22–28% of collected waste is treated; landfill sites like Ghazipur grow unchecked.
Stubble burning due to weak local enforcement.
Community Participation and Accountability:
Only 8 out of 16 states reported active ward committees (2023 study).
Gram Sabhas lack power under recent amendments.
Coordination with Multiple Agencies:
Overlapping jurisdictions delay projects, e.g., Delhi’s DDA vs. MCD issues in urban planning.
Measures to Empower Local Bodies
Legal Framework:
Revise state municipal legislations for greater autonomy and authority.
Establish tribunals for quick dispute resolution and define functions through activity mapping.
Financial Empowerment:
Modernize property tax systems using GIS and market-linked rates.
Develop municipal bond markets and strengthen credit rating mechanisms.
Replicate Kerala's decentralized planning model for grassroots participation.
Administrative Reforms:
Professionalize urban administration by creating a specialized cadre and technical staffing.
Mandate regular training programs and adopt e-governance platforms.
Planning Authority Enhancement:
Strengthen Metropolitan Planning Committees for regional coordination.
Mandatory master plans with updated ward-level integration.
Technology Integration:
Digital platforms for real-time monitoring of services and revenue.
Implement SwachhAI for waste management.
Mandate citizen grievance platforms with transparent systems.
Participatory Governance:
Empower ward committees with fixed budgets; implement participatory budgeting.
Institutionalize citizen monitoring via social audits.
Environmental Management:
Develop integrated waste management systems and green infrastructure projects.
Mandate urban climate action plans with dedicated funding.
Conclusion
Strengthening local governance in India requires fiscal autonomy, administrative reforms, and robust legal frameworks. Empowering local bodies through democratic decentralization, active citizen participation, and technology integration will enhance transparency, accountability, and grassroots development.